AP U.S. Government & Politics · Unit 5: Political Participation
5.8 Modern Campaigns
Money, Media, and Modern Campaigns
Modern campaigns rely heavily on fundraising, media, and technology. Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs raise money to support candidates; Super PACs can spend unlimited amounts independently but cannot coordinate directly with campaigns, per Citizens United v. FEC (2010). Candidates also use social media, targeted advertising, and data analytics to reach specific voter groups efficiently.
Campaign Finance Reform Debates
Laws like the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA/McCain-Feingold, 2002) tried to limit soft money and regulate issue ads. Critics argue money enables free speech and political participation, while reformers worry unlimited spending increases incumbency advantages and unequal influence for wealthy donors and interest groups over candidates and elections.
Incumbency and Media Strategy
Incumbents benefit from name recognition, franking privilege, and easier fundraising, giving them an advantage in congressional elections. Campaigns increasingly use microtargeting through social media to tailor messages to narrow demographics, changing how candidates communicate compared to traditional TV and print advertising strategies.
Key terms
- Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
- Supreme Court ruling that independent political spending by corporations and unions is protected free speech and cannot be limited.
- Super PAC
- A political committee that can raise and spend unlimited money independently of a campaign, but cannot coordinate directly with it.
- Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA/McCain-Feingold, 2002)
- Law aimed at limiting soft money contributions and regulating issue ads close to elections.
- Incumbency advantage
- Benefits sitting officeholders have in elections, including name recognition, franking privilege, and easier fundraising.
- Microtargeting
- Using data analytics and social media to tailor campaign messages to specific, narrow voter demographics.
Try an AP-style question
In Citizens United v. FEC (2010), the Court ruled that…
- corporations can give directly to candidates
- limiting corporate election spending violates free speech
- campaigns must be publicly funded
- PACs are unconstitutional
Show the answer
B. Independent expenditures.
Practice 8 AP-style questions with instant explanations, flashcards and spaced review.
Study 5.8 free in APrep