AP English Language · Unit 2: Claims & Evidence
2.4 Counterargument & Concession
Addressing opposition
Strong arguments anticipate the counterargument — the opposing view — and respond to it. Ignoring objections makes an argument look one-sided; answering them builds credibility (ethos).
Concession and rebuttal
A concession grants that part of the opposing view has merit; a rebuttal then explains why the writer's position still holds. Together they show fairness and strengthen the case.
Qualifiers
Careful writers use qualifiers ('often,' 'in most cases,' 'usually') to make claims defensible. Overstated, absolute claims are easy to disprove with a single exception.
Key terms
- Counterargument
- The opposing view an argument anticipates and answers.
- Concession
- Granting that part of the opposing view has merit.
- Rebuttal
- Explaining why the writer's position still holds.
- Qualifier
- A limiting word ('usually,' 'often') that keeps a claim defensible.
- Why concede?
- Addressing opposition builds fairness and credibility.
Try an AP-style question
Why address a counterargument?
- It weakens the writer's own thesis
- It removes the need for evidence
- It shows fairness and builds credibility
- It proves the other side is right
Show the answer
C. Ethos.
Practice 8 AP-style questions with instant explanations, flashcards and spaced review.
Study 2.4 free in APrep